<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kim Kardashian and her massive growth on FriendFeed: abusing the system or FriendFeed looking the other way?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://socialmediaanswers.com/kim-kardashian-and-her-massive-growth-on-friendfeed-abusing-the-system-or-friendfeed-looking-the-other-way/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://socialmediaanswers.com/kim-kardashian-and-her-massive-growth-on-friendfeed-abusing-the-system-or-friendfeed-looking-the-other-way/</link>
	<description>Making up answers one question at a time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:07:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: KIM KARDASHIAN accused of abusing FRIEND FEED to gain 1 million TWITTER followers.</title>
		<link>http://socialmediaanswers.com/kim-kardashian-and-her-massive-growth-on-friendfeed-abusing-the-system-or-friendfeed-looking-the-other-way/comment-page-1/#comment-15728</link>
		<dc:creator>KIM KARDASHIAN accused of abusing FRIEND FEED to gain 1 million TWITTER followers.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 04:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialmediaanswers.com/?p=1821#comment-15728</guid>
		<description>[...] KARDASHIAN accused of abusing FRIEND FEED to gain 1 million TWITTER followers.    May16  Kim Kardashian and her massive growth on FriendFeed: abusing the system or FriendFeed looking the ot...   Yesterday afternoon I received a message via e-mail with the following subject:Kim Kardashian has [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] KARDASHIAN accused of abusing FRIEND FEED to gain 1 million TWITTER followers.    May16  Kim Kardashian and her massive growth on FriendFeed: abusing the system or FriendFeed looking the ot&#8230;   Yesterday afternoon I received a message via e-mail with the following subject:Kim Kardashian has [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Dammann</title>
		<link>http://socialmediaanswers.com/kim-kardashian-and-her-massive-growth-on-friendfeed-abusing-the-system-or-friendfeed-looking-the-other-way/comment-page-1/#comment-15443</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Dammann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 01:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialmediaanswers.com/?p=1821#comment-15443</guid>
		<description>This is a symbiosis. Kim helps FF and vice versa, nothing alarming about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a symbiosis. Kim helps FF and vice versa, nothing alarming about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Far Edge &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Kim Kardashian Joins FriendFeed, Befriends 35,000 Users, Gets No Love Back</title>
		<link>http://socialmediaanswers.com/kim-kardashian-and-her-massive-growth-on-friendfeed-abusing-the-system-or-friendfeed-looking-the-other-way/comment-page-1/#comment-13669</link>
		<dc:creator>The Far Edge &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Kim Kardashian Joins FriendFeed, Befriends 35,000 Users, Gets No Love Back</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 15:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialmediaanswers.com/?p=1821#comment-13669</guid>
		<description>[...] way, it’s just going to lead to a bunch of noise. And some users are already getting upset about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] way, it’s just going to lead to a bunch of noise. And some users are already getting upset about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Kardashian Joins FriendFeed &#124; Blog YODspica Ltd</title>
		<link>http://socialmediaanswers.com/kim-kardashian-and-her-massive-growth-on-friendfeed-abusing-the-system-or-friendfeed-looking-the-other-way/comment-page-1/#comment-13606</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Kardashian Joins FriendFeed &#124; Blog YODspica Ltd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 17:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialmediaanswers.com/?p=1821#comment-13606</guid>
		<description>[...] way, it’s just going to lead to a bunch of noise. And some users are already getting upset about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] way, it’s just going to lead to a bunch of noise. And some users are already getting upset about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Palmer</title>
		<link>http://socialmediaanswers.com/kim-kardashian-and-her-massive-growth-on-friendfeed-abusing-the-system-or-friendfeed-looking-the-other-way/comment-page-1/#comment-13590</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Palmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 12:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialmediaanswers.com/?p=1821#comment-13590</guid>
		<description>I totally agree that a celebrity joining and using a platform is good publicity and I could care less that she or anyone has more numbers than I do on FriendFeed. Also I don&#039;t suffer from geek early adopteritis, I would rather see more common people on there because it breaks up the circle jerk that is social media. What bugs me is the tactic that they used to get those numbers because if anyone else did that (on most other networks) they would have their account shut down. It isn&#039;t like she ported in her Twitter followers or something of that nature. This was an obvious bot program deployment, which is an underhanded tactic. 

If Kim joined up and then a ton of people followed her and joined because of her... well more power to her and that is great for FF. But abusing the system is abusing the system. There shouldn&#039;t be two separate rules for people. (And I readily admit that it is naive or wishful thinking to think that.) 

Also it isn&#039;t like mass adding is targeting her fans or getting more people to like her (look at her follow back ratio). It is building random numbers for the sake of building random numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree that a celebrity joining and using a platform is good publicity and I could care less that she or anyone has more numbers than I do on FriendFeed. Also I don&#8217;t suffer from geek early adopteritis, I would rather see more common people on there because it breaks up the circle jerk that is social media. What bugs me is the tactic that they used to get those numbers because if anyone else did that (on most other networks) they would have their account shut down. It isn&#8217;t like she ported in her Twitter followers or something of that nature. This was an obvious bot program deployment, which is an underhanded tactic. </p>
<p>If Kim joined up and then a ton of people followed her and joined because of her&#8230; well more power to her and that is great for FF. But abusing the system is abusing the system. There shouldn&#8217;t be two separate rules for people. (And I readily admit that it is naive or wishful thinking to think that.) </p>
<p>Also it isn&#8217;t like mass adding is targeting her fans or getting more people to like her (look at her follow back ratio). It is building random numbers for the sake of building random numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerard</title>
		<link>http://socialmediaanswers.com/kim-kardashian-and-her-massive-growth-on-friendfeed-abusing-the-system-or-friendfeed-looking-the-other-way/comment-page-1/#comment-13587</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 10:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialmediaanswers.com/?p=1821#comment-13587</guid>
		<description>I can sort of see your point, but the kind of mass adoption that a celebrity can bring to a platform like FriendFeed can only be good publicity for the platform, can&#039;t it?

Sometimes I think we early adopters can be a little sensitive whenever somebody famous comes along and drives publicity to a platform. Why couldn&#039;t we do that? Because we don&#039;t have the following.

If Oprah defected to FriendFeed, the userbase would more than double overnight (from what I hear), but they wouldn&#039;t be the kind of techie/developer/general geek we know and love. But who&#039;s to say that&#039;s the audience FriendFeed wants? Aren&#039;t we being a bit snobby about the great unwashed hordes coming into FF and friending us all? If you were running a social site and a celebrity joined up, wouldn&#039;t you relax the rules just a little because of the exposure they&#039;d give you?

I&#039;m not saying you&#039;re wrong or right, just throwing a few questions out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can sort of see your point, but the kind of mass adoption that a celebrity can bring to a platform like FriendFeed can only be good publicity for the platform, can&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>Sometimes I think we early adopters can be a little sensitive whenever somebody famous comes along and drives publicity to a platform. Why couldn&#8217;t we do that? Because we don&#8217;t have the following.</p>
<p>If Oprah defected to FriendFeed, the userbase would more than double overnight (from what I hear), but they wouldn&#8217;t be the kind of techie/developer/general geek we know and love. But who&#8217;s to say that&#8217;s the audience FriendFeed wants? Aren&#8217;t we being a bit snobby about the great unwashed hordes coming into FF and friending us all? If you were running a social site and a celebrity joined up, wouldn&#8217;t you relax the rules just a little because of the exposure they&#8217;d give you?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying you&#8217;re wrong or right, just throwing a few questions out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Kardashian Joins FriendFeed, Befriends 35,000 Users, Gets No Love Back &#124; The Good NET Guide</title>
		<link>http://socialmediaanswers.com/kim-kardashian-and-her-massive-growth-on-friendfeed-abusing-the-system-or-friendfeed-looking-the-other-way/comment-page-1/#comment-13563</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Kardashian Joins FriendFeed, Befriends 35,000 Users, Gets No Love Back &#124; The Good NET Guide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 04:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialmediaanswers.com/?p=1821#comment-13563</guid>
		<description>[...] way, it&#8217;s just going to lead to a bunch of noise. And some users are already getting upset about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] way, it&#8217;s just going to lead to a bunch of noise. And some users are already getting upset about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Kardashian Joins FriendFeed, Befriends 35,000 Users, Gets No Love Back &#124; Viningmedia Nieuws</title>
		<link>http://socialmediaanswers.com/kim-kardashian-and-her-massive-growth-on-friendfeed-abusing-the-system-or-friendfeed-looking-the-other-way/comment-page-1/#comment-13562</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Kardashian Joins FriendFeed, Befriends 35,000 Users, Gets No Love Back &#124; Viningmedia Nieuws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 04:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialmediaanswers.com/?p=1821#comment-13562</guid>
		<description>[...] way, it&#8217;s just going to lead to a bunch of noise. And some users are already getting upset about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] way, it&#8217;s just going to lead to a bunch of noise. And some users are already getting upset about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Kardashian Joins FriendFeed, Gets Stiffed &#124; Blippitt</title>
		<link>http://socialmediaanswers.com/kim-kardashian-and-her-massive-growth-on-friendfeed-abusing-the-system-or-friendfeed-looking-the-other-way/comment-page-1/#comment-13559</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Kardashian Joins FriendFeed, Gets Stiffed &#124; Blippitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 03:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialmediaanswers.com/?p=1821#comment-13559</guid>
		<description>[...] are just plain perturbed by all of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are just plain perturbed by all of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Palmer</title>
		<link>http://socialmediaanswers.com/kim-kardashian-and-her-massive-growth-on-friendfeed-abusing-the-system-or-friendfeed-looking-the-other-way/comment-page-1/#comment-13555</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Palmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 03:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialmediaanswers.com/?p=1821#comment-13555</guid>
		<description>I know way too much about the careers of people that shouldn&#039;t have careers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know way too much about the careers of people that shouldn&#8217;t have careers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
